Thursday, April 23, 2015

Kleenex Box

Today, in Dr. Preston’s class, I noticed a Kleenex box that had a special message on the side of it. It said something like "do something nice for someone today!" Or something like that. It has been in my head all day for some reason and I knew it would eventually mean something by the end of the day.  The message was in a very odd place which is why I believe it was stuck in my head all day.  So to the point, it meant something for me today, not for anyone else.  This isn't about me doing something nice for someone but rather some people doing something nice to me.  

After my baseball game today, I was upset about a decision my coach made in the game that affected me.  I thought of all of that I've been through with the coaches and how many of their decisions do not help the players get better, but instead chip away at players confidence and self esteem. Today, I see this a lot with coaching, especially when I umpire little league games which ties back with my masterpiece. 

Back to my point, the coaches I have dealt with, whether it's umpiring or playing, have not worked to instill confidence in their players (including me), but instead work to make decisions to promote their own agendas.  I have seen a lot of it and it kills me and other players in pursuing their career in the sport they love.  Therefore, I wanted to take the time thank a couple of coaches from the past who themselves through words and actions, took the time to make sure I knew they had full confidence in me as a player, a competitor and most importantly as a person.  They were the ones who kept me involved with the sport I love and I can't thank them enough.  Not only did they have confidence in me with the sport, but also in life.  These are the kinds of coaches we need in high school and below.  They will encourage and give kids the confidence they need to thrive in the sport as well as life.  So with that, it is obvious that they too read the Kleenex Box

Sunday, April 19, 2015

Macbeth Character Maps

Love is blind

To the audience, Lady Macbeth seems to be an evil lady. She is a savage as some would say In which she does whatever she can to make her husband the king. She makes her husband do evil things to become king and has no regrets for it. To me she is seen as a ruthless, spoiled lady in which she will do whatever she wants to get what she wants. Macbeth on the other hand sees her as motivation and an authority figure who knows what's best for him. He goes through plenty of guilt because of what she makes him do but he knows it will help him become king. He questions her decisions for him and doesn't agree but is too weak to make his own decisions. Lady Macbeth sees her husband as almost less of a man because she is stronger and more brave than he is. Macbeths only way to prove that he is more of a man is by doing the things she says. 

Thursday, April 16, 2015

Act 1 Study Questions


1.1
1. Beginning the play with a dialogue between the witches sets the mood to be dark, evil, and mysterious. This foreshadows the plot, theme, and mood for the future of the story in the same manner. In comparison of Shakespeare's other plays, Macbeth requires more ambiguity and the syntax and diction used needs to be more bleak. For example, Hamlet highlighted the themes of betrayal and complexity of relationships and power. Even though, the theme falls in the same ballpark with Macbeth, the gloominess of the plot of Macbeth overpowers that of Hamlet. In the beginning of the play, the witches were going to meet Macbeth at the "ere of sunset." Line 10 was "Paddock calls" and line 11 was "Anon." The phrase paddock class means a toad, which symbolizes transformation. The word anon means soon or shortly. The "toad" and it's transformation could metaphorically be compared to Macbeth and his evolving and transforming to be a completely different person or even having a transformation in his status and power. The witch's response as anon signifies how Macbeth will shortly have a transformation - to be declared a thane. 
1.2
1. The bloody seargent indirectly characterizes Macbeth by glorifying his actions towards Macdonwald. Macdonwald is a rebel who was executed. He tried to attack them. Macbeth executed macdonwald with his sword. This did not end the fight with the rebels, the Norwegians are still attacking.
2. The traitor was the Thane of Cawdor, as we learn from Ross. Duncan says that its a relief the thane of cawdor was executed and that Macbeth now owns his previous title.
1.3
1. The witches speech gives a first look at Macbeth and his wife without saying who they are. Indirect characterization of the two. Similar to Hamlet where he gives a mini synopsis early in the story. "Weird" in Shakespeare's day meant future seers not weird as we know it, prophecy and destiny. Shakespeare means that Macbeth's wife has him by the balls. They  cast a spell to control his destiny. 
2. Macbeth says something very similar to what the witches said at the beginning of the play. This could be him falling into the destiny the witches set up. Dried, chapped fingers, gender ambiguity, hairy, old, they have literal beards. The witches tell Macbeth that he will thane of Candor and eventually King, right then he finds out he is thane of Cawdor. Banquo asked the witch why they had nothing for him, they told him he is lesser but greater than Macbeth. We knew he was thane before he was thane.
3. Banquo says the witches were a figment of their imagination that they lie or that they are hallucinating. Macbeth learns that he is thane of Cawdor from Ross and Angus. During lines 114-156 he was going over his plan in his head and how everything had just happened to him. He acts very happy and shows no incredulity at being thane. Macbeth's aside shows him rationalizing what happened to him and he begins to think that he is going to be King soon. Macbeth tells Banquo that he is happy and excited and nothing more he explains his behavior by saying he is confused.
1.4
1. Cawdor was executed after openly confessing his treason and pleading for mercy. Malcolm tried to stick up for the thane, but the king responds by basically saying that you can't trust a man according to his face. He doesn't believe the thane was truly repentant.
2. The king greets them by saying that he can never repay them enough for their good deeds, but announces he will leave all his estate and names his son, Malcolm, prince of Cumberland. He then proposes that they go to Macbeth's castle at Inverness. Macbeth tells himself that the only way to be king is to get rid of Malcolm, and even though he'll be appalled at his action, he must do it.
1.5
1. Macbeth was honest with his wife when he informs her of his new title as "Thane of Cawdor." He refers to the witches as "weird sisters" probably because he doesn't want her know that he is associated with the "evil servants."
Lady Macbeth responds by saying that she thinks Macbeth is playng things off as if everything is fine. By saying "but be the serpent under't", she describes him as someone that lies to make everything appear under control. This doesn't really match the characterization of Macbeth so far in the story which implies that there is something the audience doesn't know about him. 
2. The wife was confident about the guests visit. She also seemed prepared and a little cocky about the way her and her husband would handle it.
3. Lady Macbeth. Yes she wants to kill Duncan. No, he isn't sure whether he wants to follow through with Lady Macbeths orders or not. She tells him not to let Duncan see tomorrow.
4. The question appears to answer itself. 
1.6
1. The opening speeches (1.6.1-10) describe how the surroundings of the castle are "pleasant" and the air is sweet-maybe even too sweet. From the outside, the castle appears to be paradise.
Lady Macbeth's welcome is formal. Her language is totally different from her language in the previous scene which shows how fake and dishonest her welcome was.
1.7
1. "If it were done when 'tis done then 'twere well." If it were done when it was done it was done well. (Meaning if he completed the death quickly and efficiently and with no complications then he did the job well.) Macbeth is determined to kill the king and be done with him but in lines 1-12 he is fearful of how the "inventor" will judge his actions. He's violating the hospitality of his kinship and responsibilities as a host towards his guest by trying to kill his guest instead of protecting them. The motivation that Macbeth attributes to himself in lines 25-28 is the attribute of an Arabic heaven-like God. He will be seen as a "God" and that is his source of motivation to get the job done.
2. In lines 28-30 she is complaining about him leaving the chamber because it was  almost time for dinner. Macbeth responds to her complaining by saying did he ask for me? And lady Macbeth says don't you know he did? The positions are lady Macbeth is ready for the King to be killed while Macbeth is still hesitant and on the fence about it. Macbeth convinced Lady Macbeth by explaining that he is an respected person and doesn't want to lose his honor while Lady Macbeth convinces Macbeth by convincing him to gain the power and kill the king. The stronger person in the scene is Lady Macbeth because  she's more verbally confident in her argument while convincing Macbeth to kill the King. 

Sunday, April 12, 2015

More on my masterpiece...

Unless you’ve been completely ignoring the news lately, most of you probably know a new official just got hired for an on field position in the National Football League (NFL).  Before I go on, it’s important you know there are differences between the titles of officials in various sports.  For example, in football the official with the white hat provides the announcements and signals on television.  He is called the referee and is the crew chief.  He leads a crew of 6-7 other officials who may be called an umpire, line judge, headlinesman, field judge, side judge, center judge or back judge.  In baseball, the officials are generally called umpires.  In basketball and soccer, the officials are generally called referees.  Interestingly though, most people simply refer to all sports officials as either referees or umpires.

So back to my point about one the new officials hired – a line judge to be specific – in the NFL.   Football officials are being recruited and hired by the NFL every year, but this year is different.  This year the first woman just entered the NFL as an official.  My thoughts on this are iffy. I feel as if this is all for media attention and provides a political platform for the NFL to showcase that it embraces “diversity”.   (This can also go back to the conversation we had in class about men and women in the workforce). 

What I will say is that my dad, being a football official for ever 32 years and working his way up from high school, junior college, Division III, Division II and into the PAC-12 (NCAA Division I), Arena Football League, NFL Europe and The United Football League has worked for many years to get into the NFL.  This year was definitely his best shot and he was one of the few who was invited into the coveted NFL Advanced Development Program.  He has had formal interviews, extensive background checking, psychological testing all while maintaining his status as one of the top NFL candidates in the United States.  Just this past January, those who working in hiring for the NFL, during yet another meeting told him he was “fully qualified” to work in the NFL for this upcoming season.  Add to that, they indicated he possesses every quality as a professional and official that would be a good fit for the NFL.  

Well, as fate would have it my dad did not get the call.  The NFL is trying something new this year and are holding back on my dad for now.   But I have seen the work my dad has put in for many years and I think he 100% deserves a shot.  Having a woman who has worked very hard to make it into the NFL is okay with me.  But, having a woman get hired by the NFL who does not have the experience or resume like the many well qualified officials she passed does not sit well with me.  Hand picking and creating a career for an official because she is a woman with the idea it will create positive press  just doesn't make sense to me and it hurts many of the officials, including my dad, who have worked very hard to try and make it into the NFL.

Having a woman officiate in the NFL will change a lot of things for a lot of people.  One of the most basic of these things will be the need to create a separate locker room!  I have been to big stadiums with my dad and most are not equipped for officials to require two separate rooms. Also, she will have to learn to cope with these massive players and her liability of getting seriously injured is at a very high level.  To me it seems iffy to bring her in but it will be interesting to see how it goes.  Feel free to comment your point of view on this. I am open to conversation.

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

College

So it looks like I am headed to Boise State! This has been my number one choice ever since I was little because I visit there all of the time and love it. I have family who lives there and we take an annual trip every summer and I love it. I worked my way to get the WUE scholarship that will cut my tuition in half. Although I'm not the best test taker I took many classes for the SAT and got the score I needed for the scholarship. So with that I am excited for what the University has to offer.